Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Angella d’Avignon results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Indoctrination, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 30.1% saturation with 492 hits. Analysis detected 2,121 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,636 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,310 authors). This Angella d’Avignon is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Angella d’Avignon
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Angella d’Avignon (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 1,636
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 30.1%30.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.9%5.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 19.3%19.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.9%3.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 9.1%9.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.7%3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 5.6%5.6%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Author 5.5%5.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 30.1%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 5.9%, sitewide 26.9%Anecdotal: Author 19.3%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Author 9.1%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 6.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.7%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.6%, sitewide 0.5%Primacy Effect: Author 5.5%, sitewide 0.9%Status Quo Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.4%Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Nature: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.3%False Dilemma: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Composition/Division: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.2%No True Scotsman: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos