Publication summary
15% 79 analyzed articles/videos 37,599 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Popular Science results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Hasty Generalization , and Biased Writer Voice , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 4.6% saturation with 9,662 hits . Analysis detected 125,790 faulty-reasoning hits from 207,880 analyzed words across 79 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 10% (370 of 410 publications). This Popular Science is better (less manipulative) than 90.20% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 207,880
Article count: 79
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.8% percentile 1.2% BS Score79 analyzed articles207.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 4.2% 4.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.7% 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 4.1% 4.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 4.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst