Why Jackie and Shadow’s home is the place to be for young eagles 16%

By Laura Baisas11%

7/24/2026, 6:21:16 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 120 hits. Analysis detected 1,011 faulty-reasoning hits from 937 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 31.6% and a BS Rank of 16% (18,545 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 84.70% of the article peer group.

Veterinarians in Ojai, California, continue to care for internet-famous bald eagle mother Jackie . 
According to the latest update , she is still in critical condition, but continues to eat assisted and on her own. 
She remains severely anemic, has had a life-saving blood transfusion, and her kidney values have improved. 
There is also no sign of lead in her blood. 
“Initial testing has allowed us to rule several potential causes, including lead toxicosis and the presence of foreign items such as fishing hooks, lines, and weights,” Eliza Cameron, Ojai Raptor Center Hospital and Rehabilitation Manager said in a statement. 
“Her kidney inflammation also appears to have improved. 
The eagle continues to perch and eat and this is slight improvement in her energy. 
Her condition remain critical.” 
Veterinarian Dr. 
Kat Rasp and her team performing a late-night blood transfusion on patient 26-519. 
Image: Ojai Raptor Center. 
While she’s recovering, her two young eagles, Sandy and Luna , are gaining more independence. 
And they have some company. 
Big Bear Lake is the perfect place for immature eagles to learn to stretch their wings, hunt, and become independent adults. 
It is full of mature trees and surrounding forest to live in, and the lake is teeming with fish. 
According to the Ojai Raptor Center , there are four age classes for eagles: 
Fledgling (Freshly hatched): These eagles have recently left their nest, but still depend on mom and dad while learning survival skills. 
Juvenile (One year old): These younglings in their first year have mostly dark plumage and will be more independent. 
Subadult (About two to four years old): Subadults are gradually acquiring a bald eagle’s signature white feathers, but are not considered sexually mature yet. 
Adult (Four to five years old): The white feathers are in and the bird is ready to establish breeding territories and have its own eaglets. 
Eventually, they will leave the area where they hatched and begin a period called natal dispersal . 
Younger bald eagles may travel hundreds or thousands of miles, searching for other places to roost and establish their own territories. 
This is a developing story and we will continue to provide updates. 
Viewers can continue to monitor Jackie’s partner Shadow and eaglets Sandy, and Luna on the nest cam. 
Jackie and Shadow’s 2026 babies: Everything you need to know 
It’s been another roller coaster nesting season for Jackie and Shadow , a pair of internet-famous bald eagle parents living in San Bernardino National Forest in Southern California. 
After two of their eggs were destroyed by ravens in January, Jackie and Shadow laid two new eggs that have successfully hatched. 
Chick 1 hatched on April 4 at 9:33 p.m. 
PDT, while Chick 2 followed on April 5 at 8:30 a.m. 
Their large nest in Big Bear Valley east of Los Angeles is livestreamed 24 hours a day by nonprofit Friends of Big Bear Valley (FOBBV) and has captivated millions. 
On May 1, FOBBV announced the chicks’ names: Sandy and Luna . 
How long will the chicks stay in the nest? 
Chicks usually stay in the nest until 10 to 14 weeks of age . 
What challenges do the eaglets face? 
Before leaving the nest, the chicks face threats from other birds of prey, including hawks, ravens, other eagles, and owls. 
Inclement weather can also present challenges for the chicks. 
In 2025, a March snowstorm resulted in the death of one of Jackie and Shadow’s three chicks. 
During fledging, only 70 percent of eaglets survive. 
One of the greatest threats is from cars that can injure or kill the birds while they scavenge for food on roadkill. 
Who are Jackie and Shadow? 
The pair first got together in 2018 and successfully raised chicks in 2019 and 2022. 
However, their eggs failed to hatch in 2023 and 2024. 
Only 50 percent of eagle eggs successfully hatch, so this pair has already beaten the odds. 
What happened to Jackie and Shadow’s 2025 eaglets? 
In 2025, Jackie laid three eggs that all hatched in early March. 
On March 13, a strong snowstorm dumped up to two feet of snow and battered the nest with strong winds. 
Only two of the chicks were visible on the live cam when the storm passed by the next morning. 
FOBBV later confirmed the passing of one of the chicks. 
The two surviving chicks were later named Sunny and Gizmo after 54,000 names were submitted by fans. 
What happens after chicks fledge? 
Young eagles usually fledge –or leave the nest and fly–when they can flatten their wings and have feathers capable of flight. 
This typically occurs when the birds hit 10 to 14 weeks of age . 
Males also tend to take their first flight a little sooner than females. 
According to FOBBV, fledglings from Southern California have been spotted as far south as Baja California, as far north as British Columbia, and as far east as Yellowstone National Park. 
About 70 percent of bald eagles survive the fledgling stage. 
FOBBV does not tag their eagles, so it’s not possible to follow the chicks’ journeys after they flee the nest. 
Can I help Jackie and Shadow? 
Yes. 
Environmental groups are currently fundraising $10 million to protect Jackie and Shadow’s foraging area from development. 
Learn more at SaveMoonCamp.org. 
You can also help the rescue organizations helping nurse the eagle that is likely Jackie back to health by donating to Ojai Raptor Center’s Bald Eagle Recovery Campaign . 
The post Why Jackie and Shadow’s home is the place to be for young eagles appeared first on Popular Science . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.7%Laura Baisas: 1.9%Popular Science: 2.2%Confirmation Bias2.7%This article: 1.5%Laura Baisas: 0.9%Popular Science: 0.8%Anchoring Bias1.5%This article: 6.1%Laura Baisas: 2.8%Popular Science: 2.7%Availability Heuristic6.1%This article: 6.0%Laura Baisas: 2.0%Popular Science: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic6.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.2%Popular Science: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 3.7%Laura Baisas: 2.4%Popular Science: 2.9%Overconfidence Bias3.7%This article: 6.9%Laura Baisas: 2.9%Popular Science: 3.5%Framing Effect6.9%This article: 4.8%Laura Baisas: 0.6%Popular Science: 0.4%Loss Aversion4.8%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.7%Popular Science: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.1%Popular Science: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 8.9%Laura Baisas: 3.3%Popular Science: 4.6%Optimism Bias8.9%This article: 4.2%Laura Baisas: 0.6%Popular Science: 0.7%Pessimism Bias4.2%This article: 12.8%Laura Baisas: 3.6%Popular Science: 3.0%Negativity Bias12.8%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.8%Popular Science: 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.1%Popular Science: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.1%Popular Science: 0.4%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.1%Popular Science: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.6%Laura Baisas: 1.3%Popular Science: 2.1%Halo Effect3.6%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.3%Laura Baisas: 0.5%Popular Science: 0.9%Recency Bias1.3%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.4%Popular Science: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.1%Popular Science: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 8.4%Laura Baisas: 3.8%Popular Science: 4.2%Appeal to Authority8.4%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.5%Popular Science: 0.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.2%Popular Science: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 1.9%Laura Baisas: 3.1%Popular Science: 4.1%Hasty Generalization1.9%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 4.9%Laura Baisas: 1.3%Popular Science: 0.6%Bandwagon4.9%This article: 3.1%Laura Baisas: 3.1%Popular Science: 2.9%Appeal to Emotion3.1%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.4%Popular Science: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 2.1%Popular Science: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 1.7%Laura Baisas: 0.5%Popular Science: 0.5%Burden of Proof1.7%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.2%Popular Science: 0.4%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.6%Popular Science: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 3.0%Laura Baisas: 1.4%Popular Science: 2.2%Anecdotal3.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 2.2%Popular Science: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.1%Popular Science: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.1%Popular Science: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.2%Laura Baisas: 1.3%Popular Science: 1.5%Unattributed Quote4.2%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.8%Popular Science: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 3.8%Laura Baisas: 3.2%Popular Science: 3.8%Biased Writer Voice3.8%This article: 5.0%Laura Baisas: 1.6%Popular Science: 1.3%Indoctrination5.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 9.4%Laura Baisas: 2.4%Popular Science: 2.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…9.4%

937 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers9.8%attributed speech845writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageEliza Cameron • 39 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageKat Rasp • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageFOBBV • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageFOBBV • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Eliza Cameron

100%flagged-word coverage
39 attributed words42% of attributed speech66% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Eliza Cameron: 100.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -10.4 ptsWriter: 10.4%Eliza Cameron: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-5.6 ptsWriter: 5.6%Eliza Cameron: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-4.3 ptsWriter: 4.3%Eliza Cameron: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.