Keyword summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Wildlife Rehabilitation results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 477 hits. Analysis detected 4,063 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,301 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Wildlife Rehabilitation is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Wildlife Rehabilitation
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 8,301
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.8%4.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos