Author summary
12% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,600 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Margherita Bassi results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Overconfidence Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 593 hits . Analysis detected 6,529 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,980 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 26% (4,613 of 6,172 authors). This Margherita Bassi is better (less manipulative) than 74.70% of the peer group. Margherita Bassi
Author details
Total words: 9,980
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.3% percentile 1.9% BS Score5 analyzed articles10K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.9% 5.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.1% 2.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.6% 3.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst