Baby seal gets a swimming lesson 20%

By Margherita Bassi12%

7/13/2026, 1:00:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error, Overconfidence Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 31% saturation with 144 hits. Analysis detected 771 faulty-reasoning hits from 464 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 34.4% and a BS Rank of 20% (16,578 of 20,496 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 80.90% of the article peer group.

While it may look as simple as sticking a GoPro into the water, capturing videos of marine animals in the Antarctic is no easy feat. 
Postdoctoral student Kaitlin Allen and her Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) can’t watch what they’re filming in real time, so the team has no idea what is being recorded until they pull the device back out and connect it to a laptop, Allen tells Popular Science . 
Sometimes the footage doesn’t capture anything important. 
Other times, however, it records crucial animal dynamics rarely witnessed by humans. 
A recently released video Allen and colleagues captured in 2015 (under the proper permit) is one such example. 
The series of remarkable and admittedly adorable clips featuring a chunky Weddell seal ( Leptonychotes weddellii ) mother and her pup swimming beneath thick sea ice, occasionally popping their heads through a breathing hole. 
“It’s a swimming lesson, essentially,” Allen explains. 
“Lots of marine mammals don’t teach their pups to swim, seals especially. 
They nurse them for a bit, and then they wean them, and then the pup is on their own to figure it out. 
But Weddell seals in the Antarctic do.” 
The species represents Earth’s southernmost breeding mammal . 
They are extraordinary divers, who can hold their breath for over an hour. 
However, since pups are born on the sea ice, they must develop their diving skills over time. 
In the footage, the mother seal encourages this by waiting for her pup in the water, who will ultimately follow in search of her milk. 
“They’re not doing much, but this pup is for the first time having to hold its breath in the water and learning to navigate the sea ice,” says Allen. 
“It needs to learn to come back to the breathing hole, to find the breathing hole when it needs to take a breath, how to get in and out of the water.Mom is just keeping the pup company. 
She’ll help them get out of the water if they need to. 
They’ll scrape the ice with their teeth to create more traction.” 
In addition to swimming lessons, Weddell seal mothers also transfer a huge amount of energy to their pups through their milk without eating anything themselves. 
In less than two months, a mother Weddell seal sheds around 300 pounds. 
Specifically, Allen and her colleagues are studying the mom-to-pup transfer of iron, which is what allows the species to hold their breaths for so long. 
This huge loss of iron on the part of the mother would be greatly detrimental in humans. 
But it’s clearly working for Weddell seals, and so Allen and her team are currently investigating the seal-ious enigma. 
The post Baby seal gets a swimming lesson appeared first on Popular Science . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.6%Margherita Bassi: 3.6%Popular Science: 2.2%Confirmation Bias5.6%This article: 0.0%Margherita Bassi: 1.8%Popular Science: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 2.6%Margherita Bassi: 2.9%Popular Science: 2.6%Availability Heuristic2.6%This article: 6.3%Margherita Bassi: 2.5%Popular Science: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic6.3%This article: 0.0%Margherita Bassi: 0.3%Popular Science: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 11.0%Margherita Bassi: 5.3%Popular Science: 3.0%Overconfidence Bias11.0%This article: 6.9%Margherita Bassi: 4.0%Popular Science: 3.5%Framing Effect6.9%This article: 0.0%Margherita Bassi: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Margherita Bassi: 0.8%Popular Science: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Margherita Bassi: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 10.3%Margherita Bassi: 1.9%Popular Science: 4.7%Optimism Bias10.3%This article: 0.0%Margherita Bassi: 0.7%Popular Science: 0.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Margherita Bassi: 1.6%Popular Science: 3.0%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Margherita Bassi: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 16.2%Margherita Bassi: 0.8%Popular Science: 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error16.2%This article: 0.0%Margherita Bassi: 0.6%Popular Science: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Margherita Bassi: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.4%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Margherita Bassi: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 7.3%Margherita Bassi: 2.2%Popular Science: 2.2%Halo Effect7.3%This article: 0.0%Margherita Bassi: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Margherita Bassi: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Margherita Bassi: 0.5%Popular Science: 0.9%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Margherita Bassi: 0.1%Popular Science: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Margherita Bassi: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Margherita Bassi: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Margherita Bassi: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 3.9%Margherita Bassi: 5.9%Popular Science: 4.3%Appeal to Authority3.9%This article: 1.5%Margherita Bassi: 1.0%Popular Science: 0.8%False Dilemma1.5%This article: 0.0%Margherita Bassi: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Margherita Bassi: 0.3%Popular Science: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 10.1%Margherita Bassi: 5.4%Popular Science: 4.2%Hasty Generalization10.1%This article: 0.0%Margherita Bassi: 0.5%Popular Science: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Margherita Bassi: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 7.3%Margherita Bassi: 1.6%Popular Science: 2.8%Appeal to Emotion7.3%This article: 0.0%Margherita Bassi: 0.6%Popular Science: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 9.1%Margherita Bassi: 2.8%Popular Science: 2.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)9.1%This article: 0.0%Margherita Bassi: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 5.4%Margherita Bassi: 0.6%Popular Science: 0.5%Burden of Proof5.4%This article: 5.4%Margherita Bassi: 0.9%Popular Science: 0.4%Appeal to Nature5.4%This article: 9.1%Margherita Bassi: 0.4%Popular Science: 0.4%Composition/Division9.1%This article: 1.5%Margherita Bassi: 0.7%Popular Science: 2.3%Anecdotal1.5%This article: 0.0%Margherita Bassi: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 31.0%Margherita Bassi: 4.3%Popular Science: 2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)31.0%This article: 0.0%Margherita Bassi: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Margherita Bassi: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Margherita Bassi: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 4.1%Margherita Bassi: 0.4%Popular Science: 0.2%Special Pleading4.1%This article: 0.0%Margherita Bassi: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 10.1%Margherita Bassi: 3.5%Popular Science: 1.6%Unattributed Quote10.1%This article: 1.5%Margherita Bassi: 0.7%Popular Science: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection1.5%This article: 0.0%Margherita Bassi: 4.8%Popular Science: 3.9%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Margherita Bassi: 0.3%Popular Science: 1.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Margherita Bassi: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Margherita Bassi: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Margherita Bassi: 1.2%Popular Science: 2.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

464 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker40%attributed speech278writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageKaitlin Allen • 47 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageKaitlin Allen • 7 words • 100.0% coverageKaitlin Allen • 12 words • 0.0% coverageKaitlin Allen • 23 words • 0.0% coverageKaitlin Allen • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageKaitlin Allen • 29 words • 0.0% coverageKaitlin Allen • 38 words • 0.0% coverageKaitlin Allen • 12 words • 0.0% coverageKaitlin Allen • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Kaitlin Allen

100%flagged-word coverage
186 attributed words100% of attributed speech90% writer coverage
0%15.0%30.0%Unattributed Quote+25.3 ptsWriter: 0.0%Kaitlin Allen: 25.3%25.3%Quote-first Misdirection+3.8 ptsWriter: 0.0%Kaitlin Allen: 3.8%3.8%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.