Popular Science15%
Insects survive 1,213 feet of pressure under water, defying physics 13%
By Margherita Bassi10%
7/23/2026, 6:00:00 PM
Keywords: Insects, Water Pressure, Lake Flies, Chaoborus Edulis, Resilin, Buoyancy, Material Science
BS Summary: This article contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question, Optimism Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 24.2% saturation with 136 hits. Analysis detected 521 faulty-reasoning hits from 562 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 29.9% and a BS Rank of 13% (19,054 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 87.10% of the article peer group.
Like it or not, insects are everywhere, including places where you may not want them to be.
Yet there is one environment that they don’t call home—the open ocean .
An enduring explanation for this absence is that deep water pressure would fill their tiny respiratory systems with air and they would then cave in.
But one particular insect larva is challenging this idea.
Meet lake flies ( Chaoborus edulis ).
In East Africa’s Lake Malawi, billions of their larvae spend their days over 656 feet (200 meters) below the surface of the water before coming back up to feed at night.
“Uniquely, Chaoborus midge larvae have modified their respiratory system into two pairs of air-filled sacs which they use to control their buoyancy,” Philip Matthews , a co-author of the study and a researcher who studies insects’ respiratory adaptations at the University of British Columbia tells Popular Science .
“By regulating the pH of the air sacs’ walls, they cause them to expand or contract via a distinct ‘chemo-mechanical’ system.”
Matthews and his team were intrigued by how this mechanism works, but realized that using air sacs to regulate buoyancy while diving presents a problem.
“The gas inside an air sac is not pressurized (it is roughly the same as the atmospheric pressure at the water’s surface),” he explains.
“This begged the question: how deep can these insects dive before their air sacs cannot expand against the pressure?
And at what depth do they fail completely and implode?”
The team decided to investigate this in Lake Malawi’s Chaoborus edulis larva, to solve this puzzle.
The findings, detailed in a study published today in the journal Science , trace the larva’s daily diving routine with a sonar system, and look at what is going on at the biological level.
The walls of C. edulis ’ air sacs have resilin, a substance that grows or shrinks in volume according to the wall’s pH.
This dynamic gives the larvae the ability to change their buoyancy.
A swarm of the lake fly larvae over Lake Malawi.
Image: Philip Matthews.
But how long can their air sacs hold out?
Pressure chambers provide the answer.
The researchers put larvae in these small chambers to see how much pressure they could withstand before their air-sacs imploded.
The larvae’s air sacs could endure pressure equivalent to over 1,213 feet (400 meters) below the surface of the water, which is way deeper than they routinely descend.
The study ultimately suggests that pressure isn’t what’s keeping insects out of open oceans, and their findings regarding resilin could hold relevance for material science.
“Resilin was previously known as a passive and flexible part of insect exoskeleton, but through its ability to swell and shrink in response to changes in pH, it generates force of its own in Chaoborus , changing the shape and volume of the air sac,” says Evan McKenzie , a co-author of the study and a PhD student at The University of British Columbia’s Department of Zoology.
“We think this could make Chaoborus resilin of great interest to material science where it could be developed as a dynamic material that morphs its shape in response to changes in its chemical environment.”
The post Insects survive 1,213 feet of pressure under water, defying physics appeared first on Popular Science .
Speakers
2speakers40%attributed speech339writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Selected voice
100%flagged-word coverageEvan McKenzie
101 attributed words45% of attributed speech58% writer coverage
Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Analysis
Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.