Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Animal Adaptations results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 136 hits. Analysis detected 661 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,686 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Animal Adaptations is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Animal Adaptations
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
⁠0%Animal Adaptations (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 1,686
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 8.1%8.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.7%1.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.9%Composition/Division: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos