Topic summary
13% 11 analyzed articles/videos 3,010 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marine Biology results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Biased Writer Voice , and Optimism Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 1,803 hits . Analysis detected 19,950 faulty-reasoning hits from 32,474 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 6% (14,836 of 15,753 topics). This Marine Biology is better (less manipulative) than 94.20% of the peer group. Marine Biology
Topic details
Total words: 32,474
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.8% percentile 1.4% BS Score11 analyzed articles32.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst