Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 863 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sara Hashemi results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Overconfidence Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 790 hits . Analysis detected 3,552 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,458 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 27% (4,672 of 6,359 authors). This Sara Hashemi is better (less manipulative) than 73.50% of the peer group. Sara Hashemi
Author details
Total words: 6,458
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.5% percentile 1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 12.2% 12.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.6% 6.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 12.2%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.1% Composition/Division: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst