Author summary
34% 17 analyzed articles/videos 8,147 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Darren Orf results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 3,149 hits . Analysis detected 32,341 faulty-reasoning hits from 39,192 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 23% (4,871 of 6,316 authors). This Darren Orf is better (less manipulative) than 77.10% of the peer group. Darren Orf
Author details
Total words: 39,192
Article count: 17
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.9% percentile 1.8% BS Score17 analyzed articles39.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.7% 7.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.0% 0.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.0%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst