Author summary
56% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,639 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sage Kelley results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Halo Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 742 hits . Analysis detected 5,619 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,917 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 23% (5,156 of 6,628 authors). This Sage Kelley is better (less manipulative) than 77.80% of the peer group. Sage Kelley
Author details
Total words: 7,917
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.2% percentile 1.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.6% 4.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.4% 9.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst