Author summary
37% 3 analyzed articles/videos 475 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Cody results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 370 hits . Analysis detected 2,421 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,659 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 66% (2,123 of 6,244 authors). This Daniel Cody is worse (more manipulative) than 66.00% of the peer group. Daniel Cody
Author details
Total words: 2,659
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.0% percentile 3.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.4% 9.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.6% 9.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 11.1% 11.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.9% 13.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.1% 2.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.6%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 6.1%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 5.4%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Appeal to Nature: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.2% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst