Topic summary
45% 17 analyzed articles/videos 8,003 analyzed words
BS Summary: These National Monuments results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 4,890 hits . Analysis detected 38,350 faulty-reasoning hits from 41,960 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 19% (12,849 of 15,760 topics). This National Monuments is better (less manipulative) than 81.50% of the peer group. National Monuments
Topic details
Total words: 41,960
Article count: 17
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.5% percentile 1.9% BS Score17 analyzed articles42K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.7% 11.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 10.6% 10.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst