Keyword summary
â 53% 11 analyzed articles/videos 3,531 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bill Clinton results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 3,724 hits . Analysis detected 30,317 faulty-reasoning hits from 30,478 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of â 23% (27,196 of 35,155 keywords). This Bill Clinton is better (less manipulative) than 77.40% of the peer group. Bill Clinton
Keyword details
Total words: 30,478
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.6% percentile 2.0% BS Score11 analyzed articles30.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.2% 12.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst