Publication summary
83%1 analyzed article/video684 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cache Valley Daily results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, In-Group Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 21.2% saturation with 581 hits. Analysis detected 2,988 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,736 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 84% (64 of 379 publications). This Cache Valley Daily is worse (more manipulative) than 83.30% of the peer group.
Cache Valley Daily
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
0%WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta1%
1%Brookings1%
1%FactCheck.org1%
1%@politifact1%
2%Berkeleyside1%
84%Cache Valley Daily (selected)4%
99%Utah Hockey Club13%
100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
100%MS NOW Live Events26%
100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
100%NBC 6 South Florida33%
Publication details
Total words: 2,736
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

83% percentile
025507510083.3% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 4.2%4.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 4.0%4.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 2.5%2.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 21.2%21.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 11.2%11.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Publication 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Publication 1.5%1.5%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Publication 5.8%5.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Publication 1.4%1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Publication 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 21.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 11.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Publication 8.2%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Publication 6.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 5.3%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Publication 5.8%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Publication 5.0%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 4.3%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 0.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate

Analyzed articles and videos