Author summary
73% 1 analyzed article/video 684 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charlie Schill results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , In-Group Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 21.2% saturation with 581 hits . Analysis detected 2,988 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,736 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 69% (1,969 of 6,258 authors). This Charlie Schill is worse (more manipulative) than 68.50% of the peer group. Charlie Schill
Author details
Total words: 2,736
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.5% percentile 3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 21.2% 21.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.2% 11.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.5% 1.5% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 5.8% 5.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.4% 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 21.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 6.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 1.4% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.5% Begging the Question: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst