Author summary
42% 11 analyzed articles/videos 1,014 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David A. Lieb results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 3,422 hits . Analysis detected 28,939 faulty-reasoning hits from 42,606 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 15% (5,319 of 6,244 authors). This David A. Lieb is better (less manipulative) than 85.20% of the peer group. David A. Lieb
Author details
Total words: 42,606
Article count: 11
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.8% percentile 1.6% BS Score11 analyzed articles42.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.3% 6.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.1% 5.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst