Publication summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These WJXT results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 454 hits . Analysis detected 3,273 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,244 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 398 publications). This WJXT is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 4,244
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 10.7% 10.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 4.5% 4.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 3.7% 3.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Publication 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 10.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 6.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 7.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Loss Aversion: Publication 3.8%, sitewide 2.5% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 2.0% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst