Author summary
44%7 analyzed articles/videos1,014 analyzed words
BS Summary: These M.k. Wildeman results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 2,405 hits. Analysis detected 19,380 faulty-reasoning hits from 27,182 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 21% (4,897 of 6,171 authors). This M.k. Wildeman is better (less manipulative) than 79.40% of the peer group.
M.k. Wildeman
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
21%M.k. Wildeman (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 27,182
Article count: 7
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

21% percentile
025507510020.6% percentile
1.7% BS Score7 analyzed articles27.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.8%8.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.3%6.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.9%1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.2%5.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.9%3.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.0%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos