RedState91%

This Case Leaves You Wondering: Is There No Crime Too Evil for Activist Judges to Let Illegals Walk Free? 61%

By Rusty Weiss90%

7/14/2026, 6:44:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 48.9% saturation with 247 hits. Analysis detected 1,666 faulty-reasoning hits from 505 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 56.8% and a BS Rank of 61% (8,567 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 60.90% of the article peer group.

A convicted Cuban plane hijacker who terrorized a flight crew and forced a plane to divert to Florida in 2003 is back on the streets after a Bill Clinton-appointed federal judge ordered his release from ICE custody last week. 
Miakel Guerra Morales, who served roughly 20 years in federal prison for aircraft piracy, had been detained by immigration authorities since December. 
He was awaiting deportation. 
That is, until U.S. 
District Judge John E. 
Steele ruled on July 8th that he could no longer be held, despite the ongoing removal process. 
A report from the magistrate judge in 2009 highlights some aspects of the brutality involved in the hijacking. 
The hijackers— Morales and a handful of co-defendants—wielded the plane’s emergency axes and several knives in an attempt to control the pilot and crew. 
Knives were, on multiple occasions, pressed against the throats of some individuals. 
Morales was, according to the document, one of two assailants who pushed a steward "face down to the floor of the cabin" and "held a knife to his throat as they bound his hands behind him with a cord." 
During the chaos, the flight technician grabbed an axe to fight back, but reportedly stopped when he heard shouting from the passenger cabin that the hijackers had taken children hostage. 
Defense lawyers portrayed the incident as a “freedom flight” out of Cuba, claiming the crew and an airport security guard were complicit. 
They alleged that the crew helped smuggle the knives aboard and recruited the six men to carry out what was meant to appear as a hijacking. 
The judge in their case rejected efforts to portray the hijacking as political, while prosecutors argued that escaping your country of origin does not justify hijacking a civilian airliner filled with passengers (including children), holding knives and axes to crew members’ throats, taking hostages, binding people, issuing death threats, and endangering dozens of lives. 
Not to mention, hijacking a plane headed to the United States just two years after 9/11 was incredibly ill-advised. 
Guerra, meanwhile, credited the judge for his recent release. 
"If the judge hadn't been firm, ICE wouldn't have let me go," he said, according to Cuba Headlines. 
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) was not pleased with Steele's decision. 
“This activist judge forced ICE to release a criminal illegal alien who was convicted and sentenced to 22 years for hijacking a plane back into American communities,” DHS Acting Assistant Secretary Lauren Bis said in a statement. 
“This is yet another example of an activist judge trying to thwart President Trump’s mandate from the American people to remove criminal illegal aliens from our country." 
Steele ordered his release under supervision. 
That means immigration agents must now monitor him in the community while they continue efforts to deport him. 
Bis insists DHS will "continue to fight for the detention and removal of criminal illegal aliens who have no right to be in our country." 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 12.3%Rusty Weiss: 9.6%RedState: 7.0%Confirmation Bias12.3%This article: 0.8%Rusty Weiss: 0.7%RedState: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.8%This article: 11.3%Rusty Weiss: 3.9%RedState: 3.4%Availability Heuristic11.3%This article: 0.0%Rusty Weiss: 0.8%RedState: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 3.6%Rusty Weiss: 0.8%RedState: 0.9%Hindsight Bias3.6%This article: 0.0%Rusty Weiss: 1.2%RedState: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 16.4%Rusty Weiss: 13.0%RedState: 9.2%Framing Effect16.4%This article: 0.0%Rusty Weiss: 0.5%RedState: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Rusty Weiss: 0.4%RedState: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rusty Weiss: 0.0%RedState: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rusty Weiss: 0.4%RedState: 1.7%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rusty Weiss: 2.0%RedState: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 48.9%Rusty Weiss: 19.8%RedState: 13.9%Negativity Bias48.9%This article: 3.6%Rusty Weiss: 1.9%RedState: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias3.6%This article: 2.4%Rusty Weiss: 2.2%RedState: 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error2.4%This article: 0.0%Rusty Weiss: 0.1%RedState: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rusty Weiss: 4.5%RedState: 4.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rusty Weiss: 2.5%RedState: 3.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rusty Weiss: 1.0%RedState: 2.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rusty Weiss: 0.8%RedState: 0.8%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rusty Weiss: 0.1%RedState: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 11.5%Rusty Weiss: 1.5%RedState: 1.2%Recency Bias11.5%This article: 1.8%Rusty Weiss: 0.9%RedState: 0.5%Primacy Effect1.8%This article: 0.0%Rusty Weiss: 0.0%RedState: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 12.7%Rusty Weiss: 10.0%RedState: 6.9%Ad Hominem12.7%This article: 4.4%Rusty Weiss: 2.3%RedState: 2.6%Straw Man4.4%This article: 8.9%Rusty Weiss: 3.4%RedState: 3.3%Appeal to Authority8.9%This article: 9.1%Rusty Weiss: 2.7%RedState: 2.4%False Dilemma9.1%This article: 0.0%Rusty Weiss: 1.9%RedState: 1.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Rusty Weiss: 0.1%RedState: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.8%Rusty Weiss: 9.6%RedState: 10.1%Hasty Generalization3.8%This article: 0.0%Rusty Weiss: 1.3%RedState: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 5.3%Rusty Weiss: 1.5%RedState: 0.9%Bandwagon5.3%This article: 26.7%Rusty Weiss: 9.3%RedState: 8.5%Appeal to Emotion26.7%This article: 3.8%Rusty Weiss: 2.1%RedState: 1.8%Begging the Question3.8%This article: 3.6%Rusty Weiss: 4.9%RedState: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.6%This article: 0.0%Rusty Weiss: 3.1%RedState: 0.9%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 12.3%Rusty Weiss: 2.5%RedState: 1.2%Burden of Proof12.3%This article: 0.0%Rusty Weiss: 0.1%RedState: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Rusty Weiss: 0.4%RedState: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 7.7%Rusty Weiss: 2.0%RedState: 2.6%Anecdotal7.7%This article: 0.0%Rusty Weiss: 0.1%RedState: 0.3%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.6%Rusty Weiss: 1.8%RedState: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.6%This article: 0.0%Rusty Weiss: 0.0%RedState: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Rusty Weiss: 0.1%RedState: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Rusty Weiss: 0.3%RedState: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Rusty Weiss: 0.2%RedState: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Rusty Weiss: 0.7%RedState: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 11.3%Rusty Weiss: 3.8%RedState: 2.4%Unattributed Quote11.3%This article: 24.0%Rusty Weiss: 2.3%RedState: 1.8%Quote-first Misdirection24.0%This article: 45.1%Rusty Weiss: 24.5%RedState: 21.5%Biased Writer Voice45.1%This article: 17.6%Rusty Weiss: 4.5%RedState: 4.8%Indoctrination17.6%This article: 0.0%Rusty Weiss: 0.3%RedState: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 17.6%Rusty Weiss: 14.5%RedState: 15.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias17.6%This article: 0.0%Rusty Weiss: 4.2%RedState: 3.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

505 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker18%attributed speech416writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 54 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageLauren Bis • 37 words • 100.0% coverageLauren Bis • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageLauren Bis • 25 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Lauren Bis

100%flagged-word coverage
89 attributed words100% of attributed speech75% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Indoctrination+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Lauren Bis: 100.0%100.0%Politically Right Leaning +100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Lauren Bis: 100.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+58.2 ptsWriter: 13.7%Lauren Bis: 71.9%71.9%Biased Writer Voice-4.3 ptsWriter: 45.9%Lauren Bis: 41.6%41.6%Unattributed Quote-13.7 ptsWriter: 13.7%Lauren Bis: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.