Speaker summary
78% 15 analyzed articles/videos 1,700.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lauren Bis results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Negativity Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 46.4% saturation with 876.409 hits . Analysis detected 4,756.099 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,700.667 analyzed words across 15 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.5% and a BS Rank of 7% (25,064 of 26,734 speakers). This Lauren Bis is better (less manipulative) than 93.80% of the peer group. Lauren Bis
Speaker details
Total words: 1,700.667
Article count: 15
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.2% percentile 7.5% BS Score15 analyzed videos1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 35.3% 35.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 46.4% 46.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 15.6% 15.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Speaker 11.5% 11.5% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 8.2% 8.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 4.8% 4.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 6.3% 6.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 8.5% 8.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 46.4%, sitewide 26.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 35.3%, sitewide 1.4% Negativity Bias: Speaker 21.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Speaker 15.6%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 3.1% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 6.9% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 3.7% Halo Effect: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 1.1% Begging the Question: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 1.7% Horn Effect: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 1.0% False Dilemma: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Burden of Proof: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 0.4% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst