Author summary
17% 1 analyzed article/video 1,505 analyzed words
BS Summary: These CLAIRE GALOFARO results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Framing Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 520 hits . Analysis detected 3,069 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,020 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 24% (5,045 of 6,629 authors). This CLAIRE GALOFARO is better (less manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group. CLAIRE GALOFARO
Author details
Total words: 6,020
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.9% percentile 1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.1% 4.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 6.4%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.1% Horn Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.0% Primacy Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst