Publication summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 822 analyzed words
BS Summary: These KPCNews results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Self-Serving Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 411 hits . Analysis detected 3,087 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,288 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 78% (84 of 379 publications). This KPCNews is worse (more manipulative) than 78.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 3,288
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
78% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 78.0% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 12.5% 12.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 5.6% 5.6% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Publication 11.7% 11.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 6.5% 6.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.8% 2.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.5% 1.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Publication 8.8% 8.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 12.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Publication 11.7%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Authority: Publication 9.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 8.8%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst