Fox News88%

Tim Walz offers strange defense for pardoning convicted child rapist Trump admin deported 16%

7/16/2026, 1:03:14 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.2% saturation with 104 hits. Analysis detected 657 faulty-reasoning hits from 516 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 31.9% and a BS Rank of 16% (17,408 of 20,518 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 84.80% of the article peer group.

Minnesota Gov. 
Tim Walz publicly defended his vote to pardon a Laotian national who had been under a final removal order after losing legal status following a child-sex-crime conviction convicted of first-degree criminal sexual conduct involving a 10-year-old girl after the Trump administration deported him to Laos last week. 
Tou Lue Vang, 42, received a pardon from Minnesota's Board of Pardons on June 10. 
Last Friday, the Trump administration announced that Vang's legal status had been revoked and that he had been deported to his home country of Laos. 
Asked about the deportation, Walz questioned what the move accomplished. 
"Did that make us any safer?" 
Walz said Tuesday, according to KTTC. 
"Did that make the children that are left behind any more stable?" 
"Did it improve the idea that we can’t all be judged by our worst day?" 
he added. 
"And I want to be very clear," Walz continued. 
"These are horrific crimes. 
They often are." 
Walz also said Vang's pardon was not about immigration policy , noting that the Board of Pardons had denied clemency to other applicants facing immigration-related consequences. 
Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced Vang's deportation Friday, telling Fox News Digital: "Americans should never have to live in fear that foreign sex predators  shielded from deportation by their own elected officials  could endanger them or their children." 
"That's why I terminated his legal status in the United States," Rubio continued. 
"Vang has now been removed from our country and will never pose a threat to any American ever again." 
Fox News Digital previously reported that Vang admitted to repeatedly sexually assaulting a girl over a period of several years beginning when she was 10 years old. 
Vang entered the United States through California in 1994 and was granted legal status during the Clinton administration. 
Between 2002 and 2004, he repeatedly sexually assaulted the victim in St. 
Paul, Minnesota . 
The first assault occurred when she was in the fourth grade. 
After his conviction, federal officials said Vang lost legal status and was placed under a final removal order. 
The Minnesota Clemency Review Commission recommended a pardon for Vang. 
The Board of Pardons  made up of Walz, Attorney General Keith Ellison and Minnesota Supreme Court Chief Justice Natalie Hudson  later granted the pardon. 
The pardon drew criticism from federal immigration officials and Republican lawmakers. 
Walz defended the decision by citing the victim’s support for Vang’s pardon, among other factors, according to KSTP. 
A spokesperson for Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison’s office told MPR News that the pardon did not protect Vang from deportation. 
At the time, Homeland Security Acting Assistant Secretary Lauren Bis criticized the decision. 
"Governor Tim Walz's decision to pardon an illegal alien convicted child rapist so he can remain in our country is disgusting," Bis said. 
"These are the criminal illegal aliens he and his Minnesota sanctuary politicians are protecting," she added. 
Fox News Digital has reached out to Walz's office for additional comment. 
Fox News Digital's Peter Pinedo contributed to this report. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.5%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias8.5%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.2%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic5.2%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 3.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 14.9%Fox Nation: 12.0%Framing Effect14.9%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.9%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias2.9%This article: 4.5%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias4.5%This article: 20.2%Fox Nation: 10.9%Negativity Bias20.2%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 3.1%Fox Nation: 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias3.1%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 7.6%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem7.6%This article: 3.1%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man3.1%This article: 12.8%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority12.8%This article: 3.7%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma3.7%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.8%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization6.8%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 14.9%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion14.9%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 2.5%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)2.5%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.6%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.6%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.2%Fox Nation: 1.7%Unattributed Quote1.2%This article: 12.4%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection12.4%This article: 2.5%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice2.5%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

516 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers43%attributed speech292writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 47 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageTim Walz • 6 words • 100.0% coverageTim Walz • 6 words • 0.0% coverageTim Walz • 12 words • 0.0% coverageTim Walz • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageTim Walz • 9 words • 0.0% coverageTim Walz • 4 words • 0.0% coverageTim Walz • 3 words • 0.0% coverageTim Walz • 26 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 41 words • 100.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 13 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageTim Walz • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageHomeland Security • 13 words • 0.0% coverageLauren Bis • 23 words • 100.0% coverageLauren Bis • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Lauren Bis

100%flagged-word coverage
39 attributed words17% of attributed speech25% writer coverage
0%30.0%60.0%Quote-first Misdirection+59.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Lauren Bis: 59.0%59.0%Biased Writer Voice-4.5 ptsWriter: 4.5%Lauren Bis: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.