Topic summary
54% 7 analyzed articles/videos 3,710 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pardons results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 2,951 hits . Analysis detected 20,269 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,539 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 42% (9,076 of 15,480 topics). This Pardons is better (less manipulative) than 58.60% of the peer group. Pardons
Topic details
Total words: 16,539
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.4% percentile 2.6% BS Score7 analyzed articles16.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.6% 9.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 13.7% 13.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 17.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 1.4% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Ad Hominem: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 2.2% Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst