Ellison's Independence Day Video Sparks Backlash Amid Pardon Scandal 85%

By Scott McClallen27%

7/4/2026, 8:00:39 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 32.5% saturation with 74 hits. Analysis detected 697 faulty-reasoning hits from 228 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 76.1% and a BS Rank of 85% (3,469 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 84.20% of the article peer group.

Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison released a video about America’s 250th birthday in which he encourages America to import foreigners and naturalize them. 
"Every time this country faced a moment of crisis, every time we had to decide who we really are, the best of us chose to expand the circle," Ellison said. 
"To bring more people in. 
To make that promise of freedom and justice real for more Americans." 
On June 10, Minnesota Gov. 
Tim Walz, Ellison, and one other person pardoned an illegal alien and child rapist so that he could fight deportation. 
Minnesota’s Board of Pardons includes the governor, the chief justice of the Supreme Court, and the attorney general. 
“They want to take back the rights of the people born here," Ellison said. 
"They want to take back the rights of the people who came here.” 
Meanwhile, President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social, slamming Europe for importing what he called "Third World criminals." 
Trump's administration has focused on deporting illegal aliens and stopping illegal immigration at America's borders. 
**Editor’s Note:** *Do you enjoy Townhall’s conservative reporting that takes on the radical Left and woke media? 
Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. 
* 
*Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership. 
* 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.7%Scott McClallen: 2.4%Townhall: 5.3%Confirmation Bias5.7%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.8%Townhall: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 1.5%Townhall: 2.8%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.7%Townhall: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.4%Townhall: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 1.3%Townhall: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 20.2%Scott McClallen: 7.7%Townhall: 11.2%Framing Effect20.2%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.2%Townhall: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.2%Townhall: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.1%Townhall: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 5.3%Scott McClallen: 0.8%Townhall: 1.4%Optimism Bias5.3%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.9%Townhall: 1.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 27.2%Scott McClallen: 8.5%Townhall: 13.5%Negativity Bias27.2%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 1.9%Townhall: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.8%Townhall: 1.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.1%Townhall: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 32.5%Scott McClallen: 2.8%Townhall: 4.6%In-Group Bias32.5%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.9%Townhall: 3.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 1.4%Townhall: 1.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.4%Townhall: 0.9%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 7.9%Scott McClallen: 0.5%Townhall: 1.3%Recency Bias7.9%This article: 5.7%Scott McClallen: 0.3%Townhall: 0.6%Primacy Effect5.7%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 1.5%Townhall: 5.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 7.5%Scott McClallen: 0.5%Townhall: 2.0%Straw Man7.5%This article: 7.9%Scott McClallen: 4.2%Townhall: 4.4%Appeal to Authority7.9%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.7%Townhall: 1.9%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.5%Townhall: 1.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.1%Townhall: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 2.3%Townhall: 9.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.1%Townhall: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 7.5%Scott McClallen: 0.7%Townhall: 1.3%Bandwagon7.5%This article: 29.4%Scott McClallen: 10.3%Townhall: 11.1%Appeal to Emotion29.4%This article: 5.7%Scott McClallen: 1.1%Townhall: 2.2%Begging the Question5.7%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 1.4%Townhall: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.6%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 8.8%Scott McClallen: 0.7%Townhall: 1.5%Burden of Proof8.8%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.1%Townhall: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.1%Townhall: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.2%Townhall: 1.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 21.9%Scott McClallen: 1.7%Townhall: 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)21.9%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 21.5%Scott McClallen: 2.0%Townhall: 3.4%Unattributed Quote21.5%This article: 21.1%Scott McClallen: 3.2%Townhall: 3.0%Quote-first Misdirection21.1%This article: 26.8%Scott McClallen: 5.5%Townhall: 16.1%Biased Writer Voice26.8%This article: 7.5%Scott McClallen: 4.0%Townhall: 5.6%Indoctrination7.5%This article: 10.1%Scott McClallen: 0.1%Townhall: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias10.1%This article: 6.6%Scott McClallen: 5.5%Townhall: 13.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias6.6%This article: 19.3%Scott McClallen: 3.8%Townhall: 5.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…19.3%

228 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers81%attributed speech44writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageKeith Ellison • 23 words • 100.0% coverageKeith Ellison • 30 words • 100.0% coverageKeith Ellison • 5 words • 100.0% coverageKeith Ellison • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageTim Walz • 20 words • 100.0% coverageMinnesota’s Board of Pardons • 18 words • 0.0% coverageKeith Ellison • 14 words • 100.0% coverageKeith Ellison • 13 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageTownhall • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageTownhall • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Donald Trump

100%flagged-word coverage
18 attributed words9.8% of attributed speech84% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Donald Trump: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Donald Trump: 100.0%100.0%Politically Right Leaning -34.1 ptsWriter: 34.1%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -29.5 ptsWriter: 29.5%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.