Topic summary
⁠14%1 analyzed article/video516 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Child Sex Crimes results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 269 hits. Analysis detected 1,426 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,064 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (7,866 of 15,788 topics). This Child Sex Crimes is worse (more manipulative) than 50.20% of the peer group.
Child Sex Crimes
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,064
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

50% percentile
025507510050.2% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.5%11.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.4%3.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 13.0%13.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Red Herring: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Horn Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.0%Straw Man: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos