Author summary
0%4 analyzed articles/videos3,663 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Center Square contributor results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 1,759 hits. Analysis detected 11,751 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,652 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 33% (4,308 of 6,361 authors). This The Center Square contributor is better (less manipulative) than 67.70% of the peer group.
The Center Square contributor
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
33%The Center Square contributor (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

32% percentile
025507510032.3% percentile
2.1% BS Score4 analyzed articles14.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 12.0%12.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.4%5.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.2%5.2%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 8.6%8.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.9%1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.2%6.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 12.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Ad Hominem: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate