Publication summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video934 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vincennes Sun-Commercial results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 502 hits. Analysis detected 3,293 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,736 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (110 of 410 publications). This Vincennes Sun-Commercial is worse (more manipulative) than 73.30% of the peer group.
Vincennes Sun-Commercial
Publication ranking list
Publication details
Total words: 3,736
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

73% percentile
025507510073.3% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 4.9%4.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 13.4%13.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 5.6%5.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 2.6%2.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Publication 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Publication 1.3%1.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Publication 9.1%9.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Publication 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Publication 1.6%1.6%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Publication 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 13.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 4.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Publication 6.6%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Publication 9.1%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Publication 6.0%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Begging the Question: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate

Analyzed articles and videos