Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,946 analyzed words
BS Summary: These JOSHUA GOODMAN results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 904 hits . Analysis detected 5,908 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,784 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 33% (4,485 of 6,628 authors). This JOSHUA GOODMAN is better (less manipulative) than 67.70% of the peer group. JOSHUA GOODMAN
Author details
Total words: 7,784
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.3% percentile 2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.6% 11.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.6% 2.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.7%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst