Keyword summary
10%2 analyzed articles/videos1,292 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ut State Wire results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 467 hits. Analysis detected 3,012 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,542 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 6% (33,371 of 35,343 keywords). This Ut State Wire is better (less manipulative) than 94.40% of the peer group.
Ut State Wire
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
6%Ut State Wire (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,542
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

6% percentile
02550751005.6% percentile
1.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.2%0.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos