Topic summary
47% 17 analyzed articles/videos 8,615 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Queens results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Anecdotal , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 4,117 hits . Analysis detected 28,916 faulty-reasoning hits from 32,864 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 16% (13,351 of 15,766 topics). This Queens is better (less manipulative) than 84.70% of the peer group. Queens
Topic details
Total words: 32,864
Article count: 17
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.3% percentile 1.8% BS Score17 analyzed articles32.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.5% 12.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 12.1% 12.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst