Author summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,500 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sheetal Banchariya results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Anecdotal , and Halo Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16.7% saturation with 1,340 hits . Analysis detected 7,752 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,019 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 55% (3,035 of 6,628 authors). This Sheetal Banchariya is worse (more manipulative) than 54.20% of the peer group. Sheetal Banchariya
Author details
Total words: 8,019
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.2% percentile 2.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 10.9% 10.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.1% 0.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.9% 1.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 16.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 16.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Author 10.9%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 7.2%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst