Author summary
63%7 analyzed articles/videos2,433 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Akil Rashid results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 1,908 hits. Analysis detected 18,415 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,984 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 38% (3,868 of 6,194 authors). This Akil Rashid is better (less manipulative) than 62.40% of the peer group.
Akil Rashid
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
38%Akil Rashid (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 16,984
Article count: 7
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

38% percentile
025507510037.6% percentile
2.2% BS Score7 analyzed articles17K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.8%5.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.3%8.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.2%2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.1%7.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.7%3.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.6%1.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 4.2%4.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 11.2%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 5.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate