UK Visitor Says Walking Around Tennessee Felt Safer Than Home: “America Is the Greatest Damn Country on Earth” 59%

By Akil Rashid63%

7/8/2026, 11:00:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Quote-first Misdirection, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 31% saturation with 189 hits. Analysis detected 1,418 faulty-reasoning hits from 610 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 55.2% and a BS Rank of 59% (9,093 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 58.50% of the article peer group.

Days after the United States marked its 250th Independence Day on July 4, X user @EndWokeness re-shared a video of a UK visitor in awe of how safe he feels walking the streets of Tennessee compared to his home country. 
The video has received nearly 800,000 views, and it couldn’t have come at a better time as Americans in the comment section are using his testimony to reinforce why the United States is considered the “land of the free, home of the brave.” 
British man in TN: "Walking around. 
This is so unreal. 
Nobody is trying to snatch my phone. 
Greatest country." pic.twitter.com/3ZWc50BiHy 
- End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) July 6, 2026 
The video began with the man in the video, who identifies himself as being from the UK and appears to have a Scottish accent, sharing his firsthand experience since visiting the state of Tennessee. 
He said, “We’re walking around, nobody’s attacking us. 
Like. . . 
This is unreal. 
Nobody’s trying to snatch my watch. 
Nobody’s trying to take my phone out of my hand.” 
He described feeling safe while visiting Tennessee. 
This led some in the comments to wonder what’s been going on in his neck of the woods. 
Assuming he’s Scottish based on his accent, let’s take a look at the crime statistics from Scotland. 
According to a report from BBC , in the early 2000s, a person was three times more likely to be assaulted in Scotland than in the US. 
Between 2003-2005, the city of Glasgow in Scotland reported the highest murder rate of any country in Europe. 
During that same period, the United Nations declared Scotland the most violent country in the developed world. 
So, if this man has lived through these eras in Scotland’s history, it’s no wonder he feels a drastic change in America. 
However, the level of safety you feel depends heavily on the state you’re in. 
One commenter reacted, “Drive down to the bluffs in Atlanta and he will change his tune.” 
According to statistics from USAFacts , Tennessee’s violent crime rates have decreased by almost 15% between 2004-2024. 
The feeling of safety in a particular state would also depend on the customs, values, and legislation of that state. 
One commenter said, “Brought to you by the 2nd Amendment. 
An armed society is a polite society.” 
Commenters Debate Whether Other States Would Feel as Safe 
Later in the video, the man said that the people were friendly and that he would be coming back in the near future, because “America is the greatest damn country on earth, and anyone who says otherwise is a God**** imbecile.” 
Some comments alluded to the idea that Tennessee felt safe to the UK visitor because it’s a gun-friendly state. 
One commenter wrote, “Home invasion pretty rare here too cause you can get your a** shot.” 
But not all states are gun-friendly, although they all follow the 2nd amendment. 
For example, New York and California have strict regulation for gun-ownership. 
Unlike states like Texas, Florida, and Tennessee, which have more relaxed laws when it comes to gun ownership. 
The Daily Dot was unable to independently verify the visitor’s claims or the circumstances shown in the video. 
The article is based on the user’s remarks in the viral clip and public reactions shared on X. 
Sign up to receive the Daily Dot’s Internet Insider newsletter for urgent news from the frontline of online. 
The post UK Visitor Says Walking Around Tennessee Felt Safer Than Home: “America Is the Greatest Damn Country on Earth” appeared first on The Daily Dot . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 10.2%Akil Rashid: 5.2%dailydot.com: 4.3%Confirmation Bias10.2%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.7%dailydot.com: 0.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 8.0%Akil Rashid: 3.7%dailydot.com: 4.2%Availability Heuristic8.0%This article: 11.3%Akil Rashid: 4.2%dailydot.com: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic11.3%This article: 3.6%Akil Rashid: 0.9%dailydot.com: 0.7%Hindsight Bias3.6%This article: 6.1%Akil Rashid: 2.0%dailydot.com: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias6.1%This article: 6.6%Akil Rashid: 5.6%dailydot.com: 4.9%Framing Effect6.6%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.8%dailydot.com: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.4%Akil Rashid: 0.5%dailydot.com: 0.5%Status Quo Bias3.4%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.0%dailydot.com: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.7%Akil Rashid: 1.4%dailydot.com: 1.2%Optimism Bias0.7%This article: 4.1%Akil Rashid: 1.9%dailydot.com: 1.4%Pessimism Bias4.1%This article: 8.2%Akil Rashid: 8.8%dailydot.com: 8.7%Negativity Bias8.2%This article: 8.4%Akil Rashid: 0.5%dailydot.com: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias8.4%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 2.5%dailydot.com: 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.4%dailydot.com: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 1.2%dailydot.com: 1.5%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 2.8%Akil Rashid: 2.4%dailydot.com: 1.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias2.8%This article: 0.5%Akil Rashid: 1.7%dailydot.com: 2.4%Halo Effect0.5%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.8%dailydot.com: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.0%dailydot.com: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.7%dailydot.com: 0.7%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.3%dailydot.com: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.1%dailydot.com: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 6.7%Akil Rashid: 2.9%dailydot.com: 1.9%Ad Hominem6.7%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.0%dailydot.com: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 14.6%Akil Rashid: 2.0%dailydot.com: 1.9%Appeal to Authority14.6%This article: 6.2%Akil Rashid: 2.5%dailydot.com: 2.2%False Dilemma6.2%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 2.7%dailydot.com: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.0%dailydot.com: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 8.5%Akil Rashid: 11.1%dailydot.com: 8.9%Hasty Generalization8.5%This article: 3.0%Akil Rashid: 0.4%dailydot.com: 0.3%Red Herring3.0%This article: 10.0%Akil Rashid: 2.2%dailydot.com: 2.4%Bandwagon10.0%This article: 13.1%Akil Rashid: 7.6%dailydot.com: 7.1%Appeal to Emotion13.1%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 1.4%dailydot.com: 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 13.8%Akil Rashid: 1.6%dailydot.com: 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)13.8%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.0%dailydot.com: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 6.6%Akil Rashid: 1.6%dailydot.com: 1.9%Burden of Proof6.6%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.0%dailydot.com: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.5%Akil Rashid: 0.3%dailydot.com: 0.1%Composition/Division0.5%This article: 31.0%Akil Rashid: 4.7%dailydot.com: 7.4%Anecdotal31.0%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.0%dailydot.com: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.8%Akil Rashid: 1.3%dailydot.com: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.8%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.0%dailydot.com: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.3%Akil Rashid: 0.1%dailydot.com: 0.3%Middle Ground2.3%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.7%dailydot.com: 0.3%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.1%dailydot.com: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.2%dailydot.com: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 9.2%Akil Rashid: 2.9%dailydot.com: 5.1%Unattributed Quote9.2%This article: 14.3%Akil Rashid: 3.1%dailydot.com: 3.4%Quote-first Misdirection14.3%This article: 13.3%Akil Rashid: 5.4%dailydot.com: 4.0%Biased Writer Voice13.3%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 3.8%dailydot.com: 1.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.2%dailydot.com: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 2.5%dailydot.com: 0.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.0%Akil Rashid: 2.2%dailydot.com: 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.0%

610 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers21%attributed speech479writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageEnd Wokeness • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageBBC • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageUnited Nations • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageUSAFacts • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageDaily Dot • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageDaily Dot • 18 words • 100.0% coverageThe Daily Dot • 27 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

BBC

100%flagged-word coverage
27 attributed words21% of attributed speech91% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Quote-first Misdirection-18.2 ptsWriter: 18.2%BBC: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-16.9 ptsWriter: 16.9%BBC: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-11.7 ptsWriter: 11.7%BBC: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.