Reporter Alleges Street Vendors Reflect Broader Problems in Queens: “This Is What Is Going On” 67%

By Akil Rashid63%

7/15/2026, 9:08:31 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 29 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 25.8% saturation with 124 hits. Analysis detected 1,310 faulty-reasoning hits from 480 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 60.6% and a BS Rank of 67% (7,089 of 21,173 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 66.50% of the article peer group.

Reshared by @storm1news, the video on X shows a woman reporting on the state of Queens, New York as more and more illegal immigrants are allegedly selling stolen goods on the streets. 
The reporter said it looks like “Goodwill bins have just been dropped off here.” 
The one aspect she wanted to highlight is that the Queens district is represented by Democratic Party member, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. 
Apparently, ICE hasn’t tracked these immigrants down yet. 
But, according to the reporter, some of the people shown have lived in Queens for more than three years and make a living selling what she alleged are stolen goods. 
The video prompted debate among commenters about conditions in the district. 
Illegals are now selling stolen goods on the streets of Queens, in the district represented by @AOC . 
AOC is letting international criminals turn her district into a Third World nation. 
But she doesn’t care, she’s rich and lives in a luxury apartment. pic.twitter.com/5qe3ep6U1k 
- STORM NEWS ??️ 
(@storm1news) July 14, 2026 
“This is what is going on. 
All of these people here that are selling on the street have crossed into America illegally… A way to make money is for them to come and sell goods on the street.” 
This was how the young lady began the video, while large piles of clothes and other goods can be seen stacked in a line behind her. 
Of course, not all the reports of immigrants selling stolen goods have been proven. 
A 2025 report from ABC’s 13 WHAM stated that Rep. 
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez took to the House floor about a piece of legislation that would allow authorities to detain for theft and violent crimes based on accusation. 
However, given the sheer amount of goods for sale seen in the video, some of those allegations may be true for a few of these immigrants. 
One X user shared a statistic on the increase of crime in AOC’s district, “AOCs district (NY14) saw a 57% increase in major crime under her tenure. 
If she was a precinct commander, she would be doing nights in Staten Island.” 
Due to the state of her district, people are even comparing it to a third world country. 
Another commenter said this, “If the people are selling without a license & they are repeat offenders the authorities need to show up with lighter fluid & matches & burn the “goods” right there! 
PUT AN END TO THE DESTRUCTION OF NY!” 
ICE has continued immigration enforcement operations under the Trump administration. 
The video ends without showing any resolution to the issues discussed. 
The Daily Dot was unable to independently verify the claims made in the video or the identities and immigration status of the people shown. 
The article is based on publicly available social media posts and user commentary. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 19.6%Akil Rashid: 5.2%dailydot.com: 4.3%Confirmation Bias19.6%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.7%dailydot.com: 0.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 25.8%Akil Rashid: 3.7%dailydot.com: 4.2%Availability Heuristic25.8%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 4.2%dailydot.com: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 1.7%Akil Rashid: 0.9%dailydot.com: 0.7%Hindsight Bias1.7%This article: 6.7%Akil Rashid: 2.0%dailydot.com: 1.5%Overconfidence Bias6.7%This article: 7.3%Akil Rashid: 5.6%dailydot.com: 4.9%Framing Effect7.3%This article: 2.3%Akil Rashid: 0.8%dailydot.com: 0.6%Loss Aversion2.3%This article: 2.1%Akil Rashid: 0.5%dailydot.com: 0.5%Status Quo Bias2.1%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.0%dailydot.com: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 5.4%Akil Rashid: 1.4%dailydot.com: 1.1%Optimism Bias5.4%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 1.9%dailydot.com: 1.3%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 24.4%Akil Rashid: 8.8%dailydot.com: 8.7%Negativity Bias24.4%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.5%dailydot.com: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 2.7%Akil Rashid: 2.5%dailydot.com: 2.6%Fundamental Attribution Error2.7%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.4%dailydot.com: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 1.2%dailydot.com: 1.5%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 3.8%Akil Rashid: 2.4%dailydot.com: 1.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias3.8%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 1.7%dailydot.com: 2.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.8%dailydot.com: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.0%dailydot.com: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.6%Akil Rashid: 0.7%dailydot.com: 0.7%Recency Bias5.6%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.3%dailydot.com: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 2.9%Akil Rashid: 0.1%dailydot.com: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias2.9%This article: 5.6%Akil Rashid: 2.9%dailydot.com: 2.0%Ad Hominem5.6%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.0%dailydot.com: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 10.4%Akil Rashid: 2.0%dailydot.com: 1.8%Appeal to Authority10.4%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 2.5%dailydot.com: 2.3%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 2.7%Akil Rashid: 2.7%dailydot.com: 0.8%Slippery Slope2.7%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.0%dailydot.com: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 18.3%Akil Rashid: 11.1%dailydot.com: 8.9%Hasty Generalization18.3%This article: 2.3%Akil Rashid: 0.4%dailydot.com: 0.3%Red Herring2.3%This article: 3.5%Akil Rashid: 2.2%dailydot.com: 2.4%Bandwagon3.5%This article: 17.9%Akil Rashid: 7.6%dailydot.com: 7.1%Appeal to Emotion17.9%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 1.4%dailydot.com: 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 2.7%Akil Rashid: 1.6%dailydot.com: 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)2.7%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.0%dailydot.com: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 9.6%Akil Rashid: 1.6%dailydot.com: 1.8%Burden of Proof9.6%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.0%dailydot.com: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.3%dailydot.com: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 25.2%Akil Rashid: 4.7%dailydot.com: 7.3%Anecdotal25.2%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.0%dailydot.com: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 9.0%Akil Rashid: 1.3%dailydot.com: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)9.0%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.0%dailydot.com: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.1%dailydot.com: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.7%dailydot.com: 0.3%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.1%dailydot.com: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.2%dailydot.com: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 15.2%Akil Rashid: 2.9%dailydot.com: 4.9%Unattributed Quote15.2%This article: 4.2%Akil Rashid: 3.1%dailydot.com: 3.4%Quote-first Misdirection4.2%This article: 19.4%Akil Rashid: 5.4%dailydot.com: 3.9%Biased Writer Voice19.4%This article: 12.5%Akil Rashid: 3.8%dailydot.com: 1.5%Indoctrination12.5%This article: 4.2%Akil Rashid: 0.2%dailydot.com: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias4.2%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 2.5%dailydot.com: 0.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 2.2%dailydot.com: 2.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

480 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers1.7%attributed speech472writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageSTORM NEWS • 4 words • 0.0% coverage@storm1news • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

@storm1news

0%flagged-word coverage
4 attributed words50% of attributed speech98% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Biased Writer Voice-19.7 ptsWriter: 19.7%@storm1news: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-15.5 ptsWriter: 15.5%@storm1news: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-12.7 ptsWriter: 12.7%@storm1news: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-4.2 ptsWriter: 4.2%@storm1news: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-4.2 ptsWriter: 4.2%@storm1news: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.