Gothamist77%

2 killed in Queensboro Bridge bike lane crash as riders call for more enforcement 35%

By Charles Lane36% Stephen Nessen66%

5/28/2026, 5:14:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Anecdotal, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25.9% saturation with 105 hits. Analysis detected 769 faulty-reasoning hits from 406 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 42.7% and a BS Rank of 35% (14,227 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 65.00% of the article peer group.

Two men were killed Thursday in a head-on collision between an electric scooter and a bicycle on the Queensboro Bridge, according to the NYPD, raising concerns about speeding and illegal micromobility vehicles on the bridge. 
Police responded to a 911 call just after 8 a.m., reporting the crash in the bridge’s bike lane, authorities said. 
A preliminary investigation found that a 39-year-old man operating a motorized stand-up scooter was traveling westbound when he struck a 35-year-old man riding a bicycle eastbound, police said. 
EMS rushed both men to NewYork-Presbyterian Queens Hospital, where they were pronounced dead, according to police. 
The NYPD’s Collision Investigation Squad is investigating. 
“It’s not safe, but I believe it’s people’s behavior,” said Eliza Dos Santos, an Astoria resident who was biking across the bridge Thursday morning on her way to work at Memorial Sloan Kettering. 
“They need to stay in their lane. 
They rush too much.” 
Lukas Pac, 44, of Maspeth, described the bridge path as chaotic, especially near the Manhattan entrance. 
“It sucks. 
It’s just really bad,” Pac said. 
“The riders on the electric scooters, they fly.” 
He added that poor lighting can make conditions more dangerous early in the morning and at night. 
“Especially when it’s dark, this part of the bridge early in the morning or late at night, pitch black,” he said. 
“You can’t see them coming.” 
Rafael Herrera, 53, of Jackson Heights, said he hopes police step up enforcement on the bridge. 
“People without control, without rules, it’s chaos,” Herrera said. 
Transportation Alternatives, a street safety advocacy group, said the scooter involved in the crash was an illegal vehicle capable of traveling up to 53 mph. 
The group urged the City Council to pass Intro 244, known as the “Ride Safe, Ride Right” bill, which would ban the sale of e-bikes and e-scooters capable of exceeding 20 mph. 
“Crashes like these are entirely preventable,” Transportation Alternatives Executive Director Ben Furnas said in a statement. 
“Scooters that travel this quickly have no place in our bike lanes.” 
The fatal collision comes a year after the Queensboro Bridge’s newly separated pedestrian and cyclist paths officially opened. 
The redesign, the result of years of advocacy by street safety activists, converted the bridge’s north outer roadway, previously an 11-foot lane shared by pedestrians and cyclists, into a bike-only path. 
This story is developing and may be updated. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 18.7%Charles Lane: 2.4%Gothamist: 2.7%Confirmation Bias18.7%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 1.8%Gothamist: 1.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%Charles Lane: 3.5%Gothamist: 3.6%Availability Heuristic3.2%This article: 4.2%Charles Lane: 1.0%Gothamist: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic4.2%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 0.6%Gothamist: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 3.9%Charles Lane: 0.6%Gothamist: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias3.9%This article: 14.3%Charles Lane: 5.7%Gothamist: 8.4%Framing Effect14.3%This article: 7.9%Charles Lane: 0.4%Gothamist: 1.2%Loss Aversion7.9%This article: 1.7%Charles Lane: 0.7%Gothamist: 1.1%Status Quo Bias1.7%This article: 7.6%Charles Lane: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect7.6%This article: 3.9%Charles Lane: 1.3%Gothamist: 3.6%Optimism Bias3.9%This article: 12.3%Charles Lane: 0.6%Gothamist: 1.7%Pessimism Bias12.3%This article: 25.9%Charles Lane: 8.9%Gothamist: 8.5%Negativity Bias25.9%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 1.2%Gothamist: 2.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 9.1%Charles Lane: 1.4%Gothamist: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error9.1%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 1.5%Gothamist: 2.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 1.4%Gothamist: 2.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.4%Charles Lane: 1.1%Gothamist: 1.3%Recency Bias4.4%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 0.2%Gothamist: 1.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 7.9%Charles Lane: 4.0%Gothamist: 4.4%Appeal to Authority7.9%This article: 3.0%Charles Lane: 0.7%Gothamist: 1.2%False Dilemma3.0%This article: 3.9%Charles Lane: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.8%Slippery Slope3.9%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.0%Charles Lane: 2.9%Gothamist: 3.8%Hasty Generalization2.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 7.9%Charles Lane: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.8%Bandwagon7.9%This article: 4.2%Charles Lane: 3.4%Gothamist: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion4.2%This article: 3.9%Charles Lane: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.7%Begging the Question3.9%This article: 4.4%Charles Lane: 2.7%Gothamist: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.4%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 16.7%Charles Lane: 1.6%Gothamist: 2.8%Anecdotal16.7%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 1.2%Gothamist: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.7%Charles Lane: 1.2%Gothamist: 1.2%Unattributed Quote1.7%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 0.8%Gothamist: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 8.6%Charles Lane: 1.8%Gothamist: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice8.6%This article: 7.9%Charles Lane: 1.1%Gothamist: 1.5%Indoctrination7.9%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 0.3%Gothamist: 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 1.5%Gothamist: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

406 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers52%attributed speech193writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageEliza Dos Santos • 33 words • 0.0% coverageEliza Dos Santos • 7 words • 100.0% coverageEliza Dos Santos • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageLukas Pac • 2 words • 0.0% coverageLukas Pac • 6 words • 0.0% coverageLukas Pac • 8 words • 0.0% coverageLukas Pac • 17 words • 0.0% coverageLukas Pac • 21 words • 0.0% coverageLukas Pac • 5 words • 0.0% coverageRafael Herrera • 16 words • 0.0% coverageRafael Herrera • 9 words • 0.0% coverageTransportation Alternatives • 25 words • 0.0% coverageTransportation Alternatives • 32 words • 100.0% coverageBen Furnas • 16 words • 0.0% coverageBen Furnas • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Ben Furnas

100%flagged-word coverage
28 attributed words13% of attributed speech71% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Biased Writer Voice-18.1 ptsWriter: 18.1%Ben Furnas: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.