Author summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,170 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jasmine Garsd results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 1,548 hits . Analysis detected 13,167 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,490 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 41% (3,915 of 6,628 authors). This Jasmine Garsd is better (less manipulative) than 59.10% of the peer group. Jasmine Garsd
Author details
Total words: 12,490
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.9% percentile 2.3% BS Score5 analyzed articles12.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.7% 11.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 12.4% 12.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 8.8% 8.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.8%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 3.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.4% Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst