Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 383 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Liz Baker results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and In-Group Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 49.5% saturation with 799 hits . Analysis detected 4,933 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,614 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.5% and a BS Rank of 96% (321 of 6,628 authors). This Liz Baker is worse (more manipulative) than 95.20% of the peer group. Liz Baker
Author details
Total words: 1,614
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
95% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 95.2% percentile 10.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 49.5% 49.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 44.2% 44.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 23.9% 23.9% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 18.4% 18.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 20.1% 20.1% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Author 13.3% 13.3% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Author 12.1% 12.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 16.3% 16.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 11.2% 11.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Appeal to Emotion: Author 49.5%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Author 44.2%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 27.4%, sitewide 26.9% In-Group Bias: Author 23.9%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 20.1%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 18.4%, sitewide 2.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 16.3%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 14.4%, sitewide 9.1% Horn Effect: Author 13.3%, sitewide 1.0% Bandwagon: Author 12.1%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.2%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 6.1%, sitewide 0.8% Straw Man: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst