Author summary
0%7 analyzed articles/videos7,362 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ximena Bustillo results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 3,861 hits. Analysis detected 27,011 faulty-reasoning hits from 34,388 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 18% (5,273 of 6,357 authors). This Ximena Bustillo is better (less manipulative) than 82.90% of the peer group.
Ximena Bustillo
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
18%Ximena Bustillo (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 34,388
Article count: 7
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

17% percentile
025507510017.1% percentile
1.6% BS Score7 analyzed articles34.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.2%8.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.7%6.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 11.2%11.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.8%2.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.8%4.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.1%3.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.6%2.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 11.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate