Author summary
⁠0%5 analyzed articles/videos6,233 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sam Gringlas results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 2,588 hits. Analysis detected 16,652 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,950 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠11% (5,897 of 6,602 authors). This Sam Gringlas is better (less manipulative) than 89.30% of the peer group.
Sam Gringlas
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠11%Sam Gringlas (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 23,950
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

11% percentile
025507510010.7% percentile
1.4% BS Score5 analyzed articles24K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 10.8%10.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.2%5.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.3%2.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 10.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos