NPR84%

Immigration courts are using a new tactic to speed up deportations 34%

By Ximena Bustillo0%

5/26/2026, 9:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Unattributed Quote, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 41.4% saturation with 340 hits. Analysis detected 1,945 faulty-reasoning hits from 821 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 42.1% and a BS Rank of 34% (14,464 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 66.10% of the article peer group.

Immigration courts inside the Justice Department are drastically accelerating immigrants' hearings and bunching them together with the goal of issuing more deportation orders. 
The new and unprecedented tactic was shared with NPR by immigration attorneys and the American Immigration Lawyers Association, a trade association that tracks trends in these courts. 
Immigrants are now being scheduled for massive master calendar hearings  or "mega masters"  that include 100 or more people at a time. 
That's up from two or three dozen people at a time, which had been typical before for a first hearing. 
For many immigrants, this is their first appearance in court to try to make their case to be able to stay in the U.S. 
Attorneys say these new hearings largely target people without lawyers representing them. 
Those who show up late, or not at all, are receiving removal orders, further truncating the already-limited due process available to immigrants. 
"The major concern is that [since] this is going to be a group of people without attorneys, that they're not going to have gotten proper notice," said Vanessa Dojaquez-Torres, practicing policy counsel at AILA, adding that courts often lack enough seats for hearings with so many people at once. 
"So it's almost like they are being designed to increase" how many people get deportation orders automatically, she said. 
The Executive Office for Immigration Review, the agency that runs the immigration courts at the DOJ, did not respond to a request for comment on this new strategy. 
Lawyers said the practice had started in the Chicago, Boston and Chelmsford, Mass., courts and is soon to start in the Dallas Immigration Court. 
The effort comes as President Trump seeks to deport a million people a year  much higher than the 600,000 people the administration deported in 2025. 
Trump has also complained about the backlogs of millions of cases inside immigration courts, pointing to courts as an obstacle to rapid deportation. 
When someone does not appear for their scheduled hearing, even by mistake, the judge can issue an official removal order that allows immigration officers to detain and deport the person. 
That's been happening a lot more often under this Trump administration, an NPR analysis found last year, with fewer people showing up in court for fear of being detained. 
Dojaquez-Torres and other immigration attorneys who spoke to NPR worry that immigrants, especially those without a lawyer, may not know that their hearing dates had been rescheduled for a sooner date, leaving them vulnerable to deportation. 
She added that in some cases, little to no notice is being issued by the government by mail or electronically to immigrants or their lawyers, meaning those not regularly checking their online accounts could miss any changes. 
These "mega masters" are made up of people whose original hearings were scheduled for 2027, 2028 or 2029. 
"They're anticipating that the majority will not show up and they'll just be able to say that they completed X number of cases because they'll be in absentia orders of removal," said one Texas-based immigration attorney. 
The attorney spoke to NPR on the condition of anonymity out of fear of reprisals for their ability to practice in Texas courts. 
The attorney noted that if people do show up to the massive hearings, it could overwhelm court staff and judges and overcrowd courtrooms. 
In some cases, attorneys said their clients may benefit from cases getting scheduled sooner, even if it increases pressure and creates sudden legal filing deadlines. 
However, most people in immigration court do not have a lawyer and are unlikely to see these benefits. 
This is not the first time the agency has pushed to streamline cases under Trump's second term. 
EOIR has also moved to quickly prioritize cases of people from specific nationalities, including Somalis, Syrians and Iranians. 
And, cases of juvenile immigrants are also being pushed up, their lawyers say. 
The strategy of hosting mega masters comes as the DOJ announced its largest-ever class of new immigration judges. 
Last week, the agency onboarded 77 judges and five temporary military lawyers serving as judges. 
The agency has boasted hiring 153 immigration judges this fiscal year, the most in any year. 
"The Trump administration is committed to reestablishing an immigration judge corps that is dedicated to restoring the rule to the law in our nation's immigration system," Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche said in a statement. 
The rapid hirings come after EOIR lost about a quarter of its immigration judges last year, with more than 100 of them fired. 
And even as more judges were hired last week, several more were fired the same day, including in courts in New York and California. 
An NPR analysis last year found that judges with backgrounds in representing immigrant clients were more likely to be fired compared to those who only had prior experience working at the Department of Homeland Security. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 13.8%Ximena Bustillo: 2.6%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.4%Confirmation Bias13.8%This article: 5.6%Ximena Bustillo: 0.8%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.6%Anchoring Bias5.6%This article: 10.5%Ximena Bustillo: 2.8%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.8%Availability Heuristic10.5%This article: 5.1%Ximena Bustillo: 0.8%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic5.1%This article: 0.0%Ximena Bustillo: 0.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ximena Bustillo: 0.4%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 3.7%Ximena Bustillo: 8.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 11.1%Framing Effect3.7%This article: 3.0%Ximena Bustillo: 0.4%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Loss Aversion3.0%This article: 0.0%Ximena Bustillo: 0.5%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ximena Bustillo: 0.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ximena Bustillo: 1.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 16.2%Ximena Bustillo: 1.8%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.3%Pessimism Bias16.2%This article: 41.4%Ximena Bustillo: 11.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 11.3%Negativity Bias41.4%This article: 0.0%Ximena Bustillo: 2.6%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.3%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ximena Bustillo: 0.9%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 5.6%Ximena Bustillo: 0.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias5.6%This article: 0.0%Ximena Bustillo: 0.5%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ximena Bustillo: 0.7%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 6.2%Ximena Bustillo: 0.7%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.8%Halo Effect6.2%This article: 0.0%Ximena Bustillo: 0.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ximena Bustillo: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 11.6%Ximena Bustillo: 1.5%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.7%Recency Bias11.6%This article: 2.1%Ximena Bustillo: 0.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.5%Primacy Effect2.1%This article: 0.0%Ximena Bustillo: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 2.8%Ximena Bustillo: 0.5%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Ad Hominem2.8%This article: 0.0%Ximena Bustillo: 0.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 15.7%Ximena Bustillo: 4.8%Goats and Soda (NPR): 6.1%Appeal to Authority15.7%This article: 4.3%Ximena Bustillo: 1.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.5%False Dilemma4.3%This article: 0.0%Ximena Bustillo: 0.4%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Ximena Bustillo: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 15.3%Ximena Bustillo: 3.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 4.4%Hasty Generalization15.3%This article: 0.0%Ximena Bustillo: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Ximena Bustillo: 0.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 2.8%Ximena Bustillo: 6.7%Goats and Soda (NPR): 6.6%Appeal to Emotion2.8%This article: 6.6%Ximena Bustillo: 0.6%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.9%Begging the Question6.6%This article: 22.2%Ximena Bustillo: 4.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)22.2%This article: 0.0%Ximena Bustillo: 0.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Ximena Bustillo: 0.4%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Ximena Bustillo: 0.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Ximena Bustillo: 0.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Ximena Bustillo: 3.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Ximena Bustillo: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 6.7%Ximena Bustillo: 1.7%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.7%This article: 0.0%Ximena Bustillo: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ximena Bustillo: 0.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ximena Bustillo: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ximena Bustillo: 0.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ximena Bustillo: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.5%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 19.4%Ximena Bustillo: 1.5%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.3%Unattributed Quote19.4%This article: 0.0%Ximena Bustillo: 1.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 7.7%Ximena Bustillo: 3.7%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.1%Biased Writer Voice7.7%This article: 6.0%Ximena Bustillo: 1.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.0%Indoctrination6.0%This article: 0.0%Ximena Bustillo: 3.5%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.8%Ximena Bustillo: 1.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias2.8%This article: 0.0%Ximena Bustillo: 0.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

821 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers25%attributed speech617writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageVanessa Dojaquez-Torres • 49 words • 100.0% coverageVanessa Dojaquez-Torres • 19 words • 100.0% coverageExecutive Office for Immigration Review • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageVanessa Dojaquez-Torres • 36 words • 0.0% coverageVanessa Dojaquez-Torres • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageTodd Blanche • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Todd Blanche

100%flagged-word coverage
35 attributed words17% of attributed speech90% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Unattributed Quote-18.2 ptsWriter: 18.2%Todd Blanche: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-10.2 ptsWriter: 10.2%Todd Blanche: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -3.7 ptsWriter: 3.7%Todd Blanche: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.