Topic summary
⁠0%5 analyzed articles/videos8,422 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Exclusive results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 3,338 hits. Analysis detected 23,184 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,673 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (12,265 of 16,562 topics). This Exclusive is better (less manipulative) than 74.10% of the peer group.
Exclusive
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

26% percentile
025507510025.9% percentile
2.1% BS Score5 analyzed articles22.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.8%10.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.7%14.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.0%3.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.8%7.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.3%4.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos