Author summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos3,438 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jawad Rizkallah results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 1,209 hits. Analysis detected 9,075 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,752 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 18% (5,245 of 6,361 authors). This Jawad Rizkallah is better (less manipulative) than 82.50% of the peer group.
Jawad Rizkallah
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
18%Jawad Rizkallah (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 13,752
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

18% percentile
025507510017.5% percentile
1.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles13.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.1%5.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.8%8.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.0%7.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.3%4.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.6%3.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.2%3.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.0%3.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.4%2.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate