Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,304 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Claire Harbage results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 876 hits. Analysis detected 6,834 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,216 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 27% (4,577 of 6,261 authors). This Claire Harbage is better (less manipulative) than 73.10% of the peer group.
Claire Harbage
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
27%Claire Harbage (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 9,216
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

27% percentile
025507510026.9% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.9%5.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.4%8.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.6%4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 9.5%9.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.9%3.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.4%3.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.8%1.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.3%1.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate