Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,304 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Claire Harbage results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 876 hits . Analysis detected 6,834 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,216 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 27% (4,577 of 6,261 authors). This Claire Harbage is better (less manipulative) than 73.10% of the peer group. Claire Harbage
Author details
Total words: 9,216
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.9% percentile 1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.5% 9.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.8% 1.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.3% 1.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst