Author summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 7,064 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emily Feng results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.2% saturation with 3,497 hits . Analysis detected 26,532 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,167 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 55% (3,014 of 6,629 authors). This Emily Feng is worse (more manipulative) than 54.50% of the peer group. Emily Feng
Author details
Total words: 19,167
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.5% percentile 2.8% BS Score5 analyzed articles19.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.7% 9.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.6% 8.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.2% 1.2% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 4.0% 4.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 7.6% 7.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 4.5% 4.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 6.8% 6.8% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 18.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 10.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.9%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Author 7.6%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.9%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst