Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 277 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tinbete Ermyas results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Authority , with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 196 hits . Analysis detected 1,466 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,108 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of 87% (880 of 6,628 authors). This Tinbete Ermyas is worse (more manipulative) than 86.70% of the peer group. Tinbete Ermyas
Author details
Total words: 1,108
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
87% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 86.7% percentile 5.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.8% 9.8% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 17.7% 17.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 8.3% 8.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.1% 13.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 6.8% 6.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 11.3% 11.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 7.8% 7.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.1%, sitewide 19.2% False Dilemma: Author 17.7%, sitewide 1.5% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 8.3%, sitewide 1.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 1.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 6.8%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 2.7% Red Herring: Author 4.7%, sitewide 0.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Begging the Question: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.4% Genetic Fallacy: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst