Author summary
0% 12 analyzed articles/videos 11,996 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stephen Fowler results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Self-Serving Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 5,916 hits . Analysis detected 39,202 faulty-reasoning hits from 39,728 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 27% (4,637 of 6,316 authors). This Stephen Fowler is better (less manipulative) than 73.40% of the peer group. Stephen Fowler
Author details
Total words: 39,728
Article count: 12
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.6% percentile 1.9% BS Score12 analyzed articles39.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.3% 11.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.9% 14.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Horn Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst