Author summary
0%4 analyzed articles/videos2,787 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rhiannon Rashidi results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 1,397 hits. Analysis detected 10,603 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,872 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 44% (3,711 of 6,629 authors). This Rhiannon Rashidi is better (less manipulative) than 56.00% of the peer group.
Rhiannon Rashidi
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
44%Rhiannon Rashidi (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 9,872
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

44% percentile
025507510044.0% percentile
2.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles9.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.1%8.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.8%7.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.0%4.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.7%4.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.6%2.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.1%0.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 4.0%4.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.7%4.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 4.9%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Author 4.4%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate