Author summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,787 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rhiannon Rashidi results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 1,397 hits . Analysis detected 10,603 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,872 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 44% (3,711 of 6,629 authors). This Rhiannon Rashidi is better (less manipulative) than 56.00% of the peer group. Rhiannon Rashidi
Author details
Total words: 9,872
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.0% percentile 2.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles9.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.1% 8.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.6% 2.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.0% 4.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.9%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Author 4.4%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst